Given that I couldn't get clarity about the 26mph notation and the
price of this ticket seemed too high for the infraction, I chose to take
the next step and go to court.
But I am not
comfortable in courts and hospitals. So I went a few times before my
date to just observe and get familiar with the various courts and watch
how they were conducted.
The first court appearance I
would have to make would be to enter a plea of Guilty or Not Guilty. A
Not Guilty plea would get me a trial and a new court date. This first
court appearance would be quick. They push a couple hundred people through in a
few hours almost every weekday morning.
The second
court appearance, if it happened, would be for trials. These would take a
little longer but still usually no more than ten minutes per trial. If
officers are to show up, they show up at this part. These happen in the
afternoon most weekdays.
These court sessions are all public events and they're free to attend. (Short on funds for a movie this week?)
I
watched a couple sessions of each and happened to catch sessions with
different judges. I noticed that the judges varied in what reductions
they gave and what hourly rate equivalencies they used for calculating
community service. But at least they were consistent per day per
infraction and didn't vary per characteristics per person.
As
I listened, I was confused about the options available to each
defendant. Implications of one sort or another were implied but the
whole system of options and how they interrelated wasn't clear to me.
They don't offer defendants a handy dandy chart to explain these. For
example, if you choose community service, you can't go to traffic
school.
Do people get so many tickets that they already
know all of these options? Or are people too afraid to ask? Or do they
just not care?
I was confused the whole time as I saw
so many people choose their fates. Finally I asked the bailiff, where I
got clear on how points and community service and paying your ticket,
etc., were related.
I watched cellphone tickets go for
$145. Running a stop sign at about 20mph in Half Moon Bay for one
defendant was $238. Driving without a license was still not close to
mine, at $320. And several who had tickets but didn't appear for their
initial date accrued a Failure to Appear charge of $396. When they now
appeared, it seemed like their ticket fee was dropped and they were now
just on the hook for the Failure to Appear charge. I couldn't be sure
but I wondered if I should have just not appeared, accrued the Failure
to Appear charge, and reduced my fine at least a little that way. I bet
there's a better explanation for all of this but I couldn't tell by
watching.
I witnessed one trial involving a defendant
and an officer where they both agreed that it was 4am in a particular
industrial area in one of the towns along the peninsula. They agreed
that the place was deserted, no other cars or people around. The
defendant claimed they had made a complete stop. The officer claimed
they didn't see the defendant's wheels come to a complete stop. The
judge sided with the officer. The defendant received a $360 ticket.
A
few days after observing this, I am quite sure I smelled a jaywalking
ticket coming my way during a deserted morning in a town close to the
one above. I didn't cross the street there and then. The cop drove off.
Then I read that one writer's impression of Seattle was a town where
jaywalking was judiciously ticketed to keep all jaywalking from
occurring, even at 3am.
I am more alerted to possible
infractions and expect to get tickets now for all sorts of benign
behaviors that seemed to have gone ignored in the past. Is this the kind
of world we want to live in? I sure don't. What has happened?
I never heard anyone ask about the mph notation on their red light violation camera ticket.
Prev ... Next
No comments:
Post a Comment
Those who choose to offer drive-by simplistic comments, such as "Just follow the law," "Drivers here are terrible," "You'll never win that fight," "Oh, let it go," or "All cameras should be removed," are not welcome here. I will delete these sorts of comments with no more warning than this.
I will allow comments that are backed up with reason and robust argument that enhance this discussion. Agreement is not required. A well argued point is. I am interested in hearing from people with solid knowledge about law enforcement, traffic design, and the judicial system who can explain why things need to be the way I saw them or who would like to describe how they think the system should be changed and why.
Don't like this policy? You, too, can create your own blog and set your own rules.Have at it!